My child needs glasses. Are screens to blame?

The impact of screen-time on our children’s vision is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community. 

One thing that’s crystal clear is that myopia - what you and I would call “short-sightedness” - is on the rise throughout the developed world.

In some cities in China, for example, more than nine out of ten university students need corrective lenses for myopia.

“This is one of the largest epidemics humanity has ever seen, far greater than the obesity epidemic,” observes University of Western Australia ophthalmology professor David Mackey.

Are screens to blame?

The question is, are screens to blame?

Yes and no, says Mackey. 

Writing this week in The Conversation, he points to the fact that the short-sightedness has been increasing worldwide well before the age of the smartphone, tablet and laptop. 

A generation ago, television was blamed for destroying kids’ eyesight. And a few of us may be old enough to remember parents scolding “Get your nose out of that book and give your eyes a rest!”

There is a grain of truth in all of these fears.


Three underlying factors

In fact, explains Mackey, the three most direct environmental causes of today’s myopia epidemic are reduced time spent in daylight, increased time spent on “near work” and (no doubt related to the first two) more years devoted to education. So in that sense, you could say that it is study, not screens, that’s the culprit here.

At the same time, it’s plain to see (sorry!) that screen use is interrelated with all of these factors, and is helping to drive the trend. 

Genetics also plays a role in myopia, and children whose parents are short-sighted and more likely to need glasses, no matter how much or little they use screens or study in artificial light.


“Go play outside!”

Limiting screen-time is a first step to protecting kids’ eyesight. But getting them outside, away from indoor light and into natural daylight, should be the goal, Mackey urges.

Put the focus on your family's health and wellbeing this year - and make Family Zone a part of it. 

Start your free trial right now, and create a home where digital children thrive.

Tell me more!

Topics: Parental Controls, Screen time, Mobile Apps, eyesight, vision, myopia

    Try Family Zone for FREE

    Sign up now to try Family Zone for 1 month, totally free of charge.

    Free Trial
    Subscribe to our newsletter
    Follow us on social media
    Popular posts
    Parental Controls | Mobile Apps | Cyber Safety | teens on social media
    Can we talk? 100 questions your teen might actually answer
    Parental Controls | Screen time | youtube | smartphones | WhatsApp | suicide | self-harm | momo
    MOMO unmasked
    Parental Controls | Cyber Safety | Cyber Experts | parenting | roblox
    Roblox: What parents need to know about this popular gaming platform
    Parental Controls | Cyber Safety | tinder | Cyber Experts | parenting | yellow
    Yellow: The Tinder for Teens
    Parental Controls | Social Media | privacy | decoy app
    Hide It Pro: A decoy app to look out for
    Cyber Bullying | Parental Controls | Screen time | Mobile Apps | Cyber Safety | online predators | tiktok | paedophile | child predator | Likee
    LIKEE: What parents need to know about this risky TikTok wannabe

    Recent posts

    Press the reset button on your kid’s online routine

    COVID blew up our teens’ screen-time. It’s time to get them back on track. In the wake of the COVID pandemic, our children are facing a ...

    Bigger families face super-sized screen-time challenges

    If you have more than one child - and statistics show 86 percent of families do - then managing screen-time can be double trouble. Or ...

    'Bigorexia' a growing risk for today's boys

    We’re starting to understand how social media can damage girls’ self-esteem - but what about our boys? New research finds disturbing ...

    The metaverse: Brave new world - or an upgrade for predators?

    Mixing kids and adult strangers in a self-moderated online environment ... What could possibly go wrong?