YouTube paedophile investigation deepens

10-year-old Chrissy and her BFF Ella (not their real names) loved splashing around in the backyard pool. They also loved having a YouTube channel. And they really loved it when they saw their latest video of themselves had racked up 400,000 views.

Chrissy’s mum Christiane was confused. How on earth ...? she wondered. And then she watched the video again - and the horrifying truth started to dawn.

 

As would be later verified by experts, YouTube’s automated recommendation system - the one that suggests what users should view next - was showing Chrissy’s backyard video to users who had a pattern of watching videos of partially clothed children.

According to a New York Times investigation, “YouTube had curated the videos from across its archives, at times plucking out the otherwise innocuous home movies of unwitting families…. In many cases, its algorithm referred users to videos after they watched sexually themed content.

The result was a catalog of videos that experts say sexualises children.”

In February, YouTube disabled comments on many videos featuring children - in response to reporting that showed the comments section was a magnet for predators.

But the recommendation system - the main engine driving the platform’s billions of views - has remained in place.

Times investigators alerted YouTube that its algorithm was circulating home movies to viewers with a track record of sexual interest in children - and in response the company removed several videos “but left up many others, including some apparently uploaded by fake accounts.”

In many cases, its algorithm referred users to videos after they watched sexually themed content. The result was a catalog of videos that experts say sexualises children.”

YouTube’s product director for trust and safety told the Times “Protecting kids is at the top of our list.”

But it has refused to turn off the recommendation system on videos of kids - even though it can identify this content automatically. It maintained that changing the system would hurt “creators” who rely on clicks.

 


Topics: Parental Controls, youtube, online predators

Try Family Zone for FREE

Sign up now to try Family Zone for 1 month, totally free of charge.

Free Trial
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow us on social media
Popular posts
Parental Controls | online safety | Social Media
Three safe social messengers for kids
Parental Controls | Screen time | Mobile Apps | Cyber Safety | smartphones | digital parenting
Where is the instruction book?! Talking to my teen about digital risks
Parental Controls | online gaming | gaming addiction | gaming disorder
Good fun - or gaming disorder?
Cyber Safety | kids games | kids gambling | gaming apps | gambling apps | online gambling | Cyber Experts | online gaming
7 Surprising Apps Kids Can Use to Chat with Friends
Parental Controls | youtube | online predators
YouTube paedophile investigation deepens
Screen time | Cyber Safety | digital parenting | distraction | technoference
Play with me, not with your phone!

Recent posts

 
Good fun - or gaming disorder?

“Gaming Disorder” has just moved up a level. Over industry objections, the World Health Organisation has now designated it a bona fide ...

 
YouTube paedophile investigation deepens

10-year-old Chrissy and her BFF Ella (not their real names) loved splashing around in the backyard pool. They also loved having a YouTube ...

 
Three safe social messengers for kids

There are lots of good reasons mainstream social media platforms aren’t appropriate for kids under 13. But that doesn’t stop them wanting ...

 
7 Surprising Apps Kids Can Use to Chat with Friends

Built-in chat can easily turn everything from Google Docs to Roblox, in to a social media platform You may be fine with your kid doing a ...